just a couple of neat, little republican tidbits....
first, from the washington post:
Probe of Intercepted Messages Focuses on Shelby
Justice Department Investigating Leak of Classified NSA Material Regarding Sept. 11 Attacks
By Dana Priest and Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, January 22, 2004; Page A02
The Justice Department's 18-month investigation into the leak of classified intercepted messages is focusing on Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.), who was chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at the time of the disclosure, according to a law enforcement official and congressional sources.
A grand jury has been hearing information and has taken the testimony of at least two witnesses, including Shelby's former press secretary, sources said. The investigation centers on the disclosure in 2002 that the National Security Agency had intercepted two messages on the eve of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks signaling that something was to happen the next day. The cryptic messages were not translated until Sept. 12.
Shelby has since left the committee and is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. He said in a statement yesterday: "My position on this issue is clear and well-known: At no time during my career as a United States Senator and, more particularly, at no time during my service as Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have I ever knowingly compromised classified information.
"To my knowledge, the same can be said about my staff. We have provided the investigation with our full cooperation in the past, and we will continue to do so." The statement said Shelby has had no contact with investigators for more than a year.
Shelby's former press secretary, Andrea Andrews, has moved to Texas. Neither she nor her attorney could be reached to comment yesterday.
It was unclear yesterday how close the FBI is to concluding its investigation, or for how long it has focused on Shelby.
On June 19, 2002, CNN, citing "two congressional sources," quoted phrases contained in two classified NSA intercepts from Sept. 10, 2001, that hinted of an impending terrorist operation. The intercepts included the phrases "The match begins tomorrow" and "tomorrow is zero day." This information was revealed by NSA's director, Air Force Lt. Gen. Michael V. Hayden, during a closed session of a joint House-Senate panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks.
At the time, Vice President Cheney chastised committee members publicly about the disclosure of sensitive information. Critics said the administration was trying to stop public disclosure of embarrassing information about the lapses in intelligence and security surrounding the attacks.
Cheney's criticism prompted the House and Senate intelligence committees to encourage an FBI investigation of themselves. Within two months, FBI agents had the phone records, appointment calendars and schedules of 17 senators and had questioned more than 100 people, including all 37 members of the committee and about 60 staff members.
The agents typically asked lawmakers and staff members if they were willing to take polygraph tests.
Meanwhile yesterday, Democratic members of key House committees said they were frustrated by a lack of information about another leak investigation: the FBI's probe of who disclosed the identity of a CIA case officer, Valerie Plame, who was undercover.
In December, seven members of the House asked the Justice Department for a progress report on the investigation, launched to find out who told columnist Robert D. Novak that Plame is a CIA officer. Plame is married to former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, a prominent critic of the administration's Iraq policies, who concluded during a 2002 CIA-sponsored mission to Africa that there was little evidence Saddam Hussein sought uranium there. Wilson says he believes his wife's identity was disclosed in retaliation for his public discussions of those findings.
Bush mentioned the alleged Africa-Iraq uranium connection in last year's State of the Union address as he built a case for going to war against Iraq. The CIA had warned the White House against using that assertion, and documents showing a Niger-Iraq link turned out to be forged.
Members of the House asked the Justice Department how many interviews had been conducted and how many remain to be scheduled. The lawmakers, some of whom said they fear the department is not pushing hard enough to resolve the matter, also wanted to know whether the Bush administration had turned over the documents requested.
The department, in a letter dated Jan. 13, declined to answer the questions, citing long-standing policy against revealing information during an investigation.
Yesterday, Rep. Rush D. Holt (D-N.J.), and the ranking members of the House International Relations, Judiciary and Government Reform committees, introduced a Resolution of Inquiry, an infrequently used device to compel the executive branch to turn over information to Congress.
The resolution will be introduced in four committees that share jurisdiction on the matter. If it is not voted down or acted upon by each committee within 14 days, Holt and his co-signers can take the matter to the floor. Holt said chances of the resolution passing are "slim" but "at least it raises the issue."
"I certainly don't want to compromise an ongoing investigation," he said. "I think this is a way of strengthening the backbone of investigators."
Co-signers include Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) of the International Relations Committee and Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) of the Government Reform Committee.
----------------------------------------------
no accountability. none. the message seems to be that they'll do whatever the fuck they want, and if that's a problem...well, go ahead and try to "out" us on it. no one will care, so what good will it do ya?
and then, this little number....from the
AFL-CIO site:
Senate Bows to Bush—Workers’ Overtime at Risk
Jan. 22—Strong-armed by President George W. Bush, members of the U.S. Senate backed off a filibuster against a massive government spending bill. Bush had threatened to veto the bill if it included an overtime pay protection guarantee for the nation’s workers, and the Senate in December launched a filibuster to protest the lack of an overtime pay guarantee in the bill.
The 61–32 vote that ended the filibuster against the omnibus appropriations bill was one vote more than needed to meet the 60-vote threshold to shut off debate. Congressional backers of the overtime pay guarantee say they will find another legislative avenue to block the Bush administration’s changes in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that would cost 8 million workers their overtime pay protection under the FLSA.
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney says the fight against the Bush overtime pay protection elimination is far from over: Since the proposal was announced last year, workers have sent more than 1.5 million e-mails, letters, faxes and made phone calls to the White House, the Department of Labor and Congress protesting Bush’s attempt to take away overtime pay protections. In recent weeks, 300,000 workers signed online and hand-distributed petitions calling on Bush to withdraw his overtime take-away proposal, and since Jan. 16, more than 230,000 workers sent faxes to their senators urging them to support the filibuster and protect overtime. Those 230,000 messages were copied to the Bush White House.
The White House has set up a blocking system to prevent e-mails from union activist groups and other advocacy groups from being delivered to the White House e-mail system. Those sending the e-mail messages are not being notified that their messages are not getting through. The White House has not responded to requests for information about the e-mail blocking.
On Jan. 20, the Senate kept the filibuster alive by a 12-vote margin. But the Bush White House refused to back off its veto threat and Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), the third-ranking Republican senator, promised stubborn resistance to adding an overtime pay guarantee to the bill. “We are not changing this bill, period,” he said.
-------------------------------------
message here is pretty clear, huh? especially the strong segment...call/email/protest/scream all you want,
we don't care! we're not listening to you!
it's fuckin' sad to think of our leadership as eddie murphy in beverly hills cop, running away from paul reiser, through the locker room with his hands cupped over his ears, singing
"la la la la la...i am not listening to jeffrey...la la la la...."
our at-large population should be absolutely
furious about this shit.
aaaah, well...who's gettin' voted off the island this week?
i really gotta start thinking seriously about gettin' the hell outta here.